Admins

User avatar
Critt
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:17 pm
Battle.net Name: Critt
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by Critt » Wed Jun 03, 2015 5:12 pm

Need more consistent owners, having this many new owners every season doesn't seem like a good idea to me. It also makes it imbalanced, you get veteran owners like Walter who clearly know what they are doing versus a navyseals ownership
User avatar
ZachSmack
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 7:53 pm
Battle.net Name: ZachSmack
Battle.net Char Code: 340
Battle.net Server: NA
Location: East Troy, Wisconsin

Re: Admins

Post by ZachSmack » Wed Jun 03, 2015 5:43 pm

Critt wrote:Need more consistent owners, having this many new owners every season doesn't seem like a good idea to me. It also makes it imbalanced, you get veteran owners like Walter who clearly know what they are doing versus a navyseals ownership

This is why we just need veterans (like water for instance) to suck it up and become owners next season... enough having inexperienced owners it causes so many issues and no amount of rules can fix that... just get better owners.
User avatar
Teroh
Legend
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:47 pm
Battle.net Name: Teroh
Battle.net Char Code: 773
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by Teroh » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:13 pm

If there is some 50% zhl or zhpl playoff rule, why isn't it listed in the actual rules section?
User avatar
krazymen
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:10 pm
Battle.net Name: krazymen
Battle.net Char Code: 249
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by krazymen » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:32 pm

Teroh wrote:If there is some 50% zhl or zhpl playoff rule, why isn't it listed in the actual rules section?
on that point i was told that it was posted on the news in zh group because apparently people dont check the forums and they thought it would be a better idea which in my opinion is not a good argument to enforce the rule either way if you want more people to see the rule post it both on forums and group section. Also, it wasnt posted by a league manager or the commish it was posted by one of the owners which made it even more shady. I think that every rule should be posted on forums first and then if you want you can post it in zh group news. Ive been told that there wasnt a lot of input regarding the new zhpl rules on owners forums (as usual) which ended up in all those issues in the end.
Bowling trophy (birthday trophy)
Achieved level 105 in starcraft 2
Undefeated in 5v5
self proclaimed director of ironic trophies
User avatar
daggius
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:53 am
Battle.net Name: daggius
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by daggius » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:19 pm

what was mooses topic? since some of us cant see the magical owners forum.

imo this season already went in the toilet when bulba, htcp, crush, etc allowed to move out of already eliminated teams to be able to stack other teams for the zhl playoffs. that is atrocious league management right there. those trades should be vetoed. no trades should ever be allowed to a team that is already eliminated. its a no brainer.

we had 6 very good owners this season who made 6 very competitive teams. that aspect of the league was great. we had 2 owners with zero experience playing at a zhl level and unsurprisingly made 2 teams that were completely uncompetitive. why would league management ever allow those 2 teams to be ransacked for the benefit of 2 of the 6 other teams and ruin that balance of the other 6 teams? its a silly thing. the entire rulebook function of "vetoing trades" was made exactly for the purpose of preventing bogus trades such as that, i.e. 1st rounders being traded for probers.
User avatar
krazymen
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:10 pm
Battle.net Name: krazymen
Battle.net Char Code: 249
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by krazymen » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:40 pm

daggius wrote:what was mooses topic? since some of us cant see the magical owners forum.

imo this season already went in the toilet when bulba, htcp, crush, etc allowed to move out of already eliminated teams to be able to stack other teams for the zhl playoffs. that is atrocious league management right there. those trades should be vetoed. no trades should ever be allowed to a team that is already eliminated. its a no brainer.

we had 6 very good owners this season who made 6 very competitive teams. that aspect of the league was great. we had 2 owners with zero experience playing at a zhl level and unsurprisingly made 2 teams that were completely uncompetitive. why would league management ever allow those 2 teams to be ransacked for the benefit of 2 of the 6 other teams and ruin that balance of the other 6 teams? its a silly thing. the entire rulebook function of "vetoing trades" was made exactly for the purpose of preventing bogus trades such as that, i.e. 1st rounders being traded for probers.
i think there was more than 2 bad owners this season from what i heard. The owners forum is basicly a discussion between 3-4 people and the rest either agrees without any kind of input or just dont talk. Drafting a competitive isnt the only thing you have to do when you are an owner imo
Bowling trophy (birthday trophy)
Achieved level 105 in starcraft 2
Undefeated in 5v5
self proclaimed director of ironic trophies
User avatar
Blitz
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:34 pm
Battle.net Name: Blitzerg
Battle.net Char Code: 713
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by Blitz » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:50 pm

daggius wrote: imo this season already went in the toilet when bulba, htcp, crush, etc allowed to move out of already eliminated teams to be able to stack other teams for the zhl playoffs. that is atrocious league management right there. those trades should be vetoed. no trades should ever be allowed to a team that is already eliminated. its a no brainer.
The TK trade WAS VETOED, but then TK went the extra mile and got the owners to flip the veto. At this point Dark can't veto the Bulba trade, because of the TK trade.
Image

The only two links you ever need to click:
https://puu.sh/zFTwQ/57cfb6dd4f.png
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=2556
User avatar
krazymen
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:10 pm
Battle.net Name: krazymen
Battle.net Char Code: 249
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by krazymen » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:54 pm

Blitz wrote:
daggius wrote: imo this season already went in the toilet when bulba, htcp, crush, etc allowed to move out of already eliminated teams to be able to stack other teams for the zhl playoffs. that is atrocious league management right there. those trades should be vetoed. no trades should ever be allowed to a team that is already eliminated. its a no brainer.
The TK trade WAS VETOED, but then TK went the extra mile and got the owners to flip the veto. At this point Dark can't veto the Bulba trade, because of the TK trade.
why would dark not be able to veto the 2nd trade even if the 1st trade was overuled its 2 different trades it shouldnt change anything
Bowling trophy (birthday trophy)
Achieved level 105 in starcraft 2
Undefeated in 5v5
self proclaimed director of ironic trophies
User avatar
Blitz
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:34 pm
Battle.net Name: Blitzerg
Battle.net Char Code: 713
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by Blitz » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:58 pm

krazymen wrote:
Blitz wrote:
daggius wrote: imo this season already went in the toilet when bulba, htcp, crush, etc allowed to move out of already eliminated teams to be able to stack other teams for the zhl playoffs. that is atrocious league management right there. those trades should be vetoed. no trades should ever be allowed to a team that is already eliminated. its a no brainer.
The TK trade WAS VETOED, but then TK went the extra mile and got the owners to flip the veto. At this point Dark can't veto the Bulba trade, because of the TK trade.
why would dark not be able to veto the 2nd trade even if the 1st trade was overuled its 2 different trades it shouldnt change anything
LOL... nice troll? If you're serious then think about it just a little I'm sure you can get it. If not, our trade was on the same scale as TK's if TK's stands, then ours does too, no question about it.
Image

The only two links you ever need to click:
https://puu.sh/zFTwQ/57cfb6dd4f.png
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=2556
User avatar
krazymen
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:10 pm
Battle.net Name: krazymen
Battle.net Char Code: 249
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Admins

Post by krazymen » Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:24 am

if we go back in time and assume we have the same rules back then what says that both trades are the same scales? certainly not you the owners do so unlessyou know the future and can tell me all owners would have vetoed the veto then the only thing not forcing dark to try and veto that trade would be that he thinks its a reasonable trade which apparently from the community standard wasnt so im not sure what you are trying to sayhere
Bowling trophy (birthday trophy)
Achieved level 105 in starcraft 2
Undefeated in 5v5
self proclaimed director of ironic trophies
Locked