Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Chaotic
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:11 pm
Battle.net Name: Chaotic
Battle.net Char Code: 1227
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Chaotic » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:34 pm

I still don't understand, under what section of the rules is the reschedule being initiated from? My best guess is malicious team activity, but if you can't prove it was someone from a ZHL team, how does it fall under this rule? If you can prove the attacks came from someone in ZHL, why is no one being punished/banned? And if this is an amendment to the rules, where is the owner's vote?

Note: I believe ddos'ing is wrong and do not support it in any way. However, unless you are able to prove that the attacks originated within the ZH community, I cannot understand why there seems to be special treatment for not showing up for a game due to "real life issues".
Chaotic
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:11 pm
Battle.net Name: Chaotic
Battle.net Char Code: 1227
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Chaotic » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:40 pm

"Reserves the right to exercise emergency powers and make changes to the rulebook in the best interests of the league if he and at least 3 League Managers agree with the change. If a majority of the Owners and League Managers combined (more than 50% vote) disagree with a change made in emergency circumstances, the change will be revoked."

If general network tampering unrelated to ZH is going to result in reschedules, then the rules have been changed and should be voted on by owners and league management.
Last edited by Chaotic on Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Blitz
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:34 pm
Battle.net Name: Blitzerg
Battle.net Char Code: 713
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Blitz » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:42 pm

Chaotic wrote:"Reserves the right to exercise emergency powers and make changes to the rulebook in the best interests of the league if he and at least 3 League Managers agree with the change. If a majority of the Owners and League Managers combined (more than 50% vote) disagree with a change made in emergency circumstances, the change will be revoked."

Yea right, but there has been no push from owners to overturn this decision. Also the numbers are a bit different since the league management is only 3 atm, even though all three voted for it. But if 5/6 owners (this excludes nova / mets, and includes the three LM votes ) pushed to overturn the decision it would be honored.
Image

The only two links you ever need to click:
https://puu.sh/zFTwQ/57cfb6dd4f.png
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=2556
User avatar
forumusername
Posts: 721
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:40 am
Battle.net Name: kwakster
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by forumusername » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:44 pm

Blitz wrote:
forumusername wrote: if losing mets due to ddos was so severe, why the fuck would you play out the series?
Because we didn't know what had happened to him at the time? If vapour randomly logged off in the middle of a series, and came back a few games later claiming to be ddos'd what would you do? We obviously finished the series, because if there was no proof that he had been attacked then we would've been forced to accept the loss.
no it was quite clear from Mets himself in twitch chat claiming to be getting ddos'd mid series
Image
Image
[+] ruckLUL
Image

LF mediation
User avatar
Blitz
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:34 pm
Battle.net Name: Blitzerg
Battle.net Char Code: 713
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Blitz » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:45 pm

forumusername wrote:
Blitz wrote:
forumusername wrote: if losing mets due to ddos was so severe, why the fuck would you play out the series?
Because we didn't know what had happened to him at the time? If vapour randomly logged off in the middle of a series, and came back a few games later claiming to be ddos'd what would you do? We obviously finished the series, because if there was no proof that he had been attacked then we would've been forced to accept the loss.
no it was quite clear from Mets himself in twitch chat claiming to be getting ddos'd mid series
You got me, we were reading twitch chat thoroughly mid-series. I also stated that he came back into touch with the rest of korhal a few games after he left the first one and he told us he couldn't log in. Not sure what you're trying to say.
Image

The only two links you ever need to click:
https://puu.sh/zFTwQ/57cfb6dd4f.png
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=2556
TwoDeuce
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 1:00 am
Battle.net Name: TwoDeuce
Battle.net Char Code: 616
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by TwoDeuce » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:51 pm

Blitz wrote: Yea right, but there has been no push from owners to overturn this decision. Also the numbers are a bit different since the league management is only 3 atm, even though all three voted for it. But if 5/6 owners (this excludes nova / mets, and includes the three LM votes ) pushed to overturn the decision it would be honored.
swift and stealth are also owners and LM.....
carlito
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:58 pm
Battle.net Name: Carlito
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by carlito » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:14 pm

why does everyone care so much? Why not just Fuk off and go worry bout ur own shit it's a fuckin game holy shit never seen such nerdism
User avatar
krazymen
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:10 pm
Battle.net Name: krazymen
Battle.net Char Code: 249
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by krazymen » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:42 pm

carlito wrote:why does everyone care so much? Why not just Fuk off and go worry bout ur own shit it's a fuckin game holy shit never seen such nerdism
This is why I like you a lot sometimes carlito you fucking bitch
Bowling trophy (birthday trophy)
Achieved level 105 in starcraft 2
Undefeated in 5v5
self proclaimed director of ironic trophies
User avatar
Kaigo1
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Battle.net Name: Kaigo
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Kaigo1 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:27 pm

krazymen wrote:
carlito wrote:why does everyone care so much? Why not just Fuk off and go worry bout ur own shit it's a fuckin game holy shit never seen such nerdism
This is why I like you a lot sometimes carlito you fucking bitch
https://youtu.be/aLebTbpgv_k?t=4m42s
Sid: HEAD OF STATS
Sid: DOES 0 STATS
Sid: SHAKE
Sid: MY
Sid: GOD
Sid: DAMN
Sid: HEAD
User avatar
Bulbasaaur
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 7:22 pm
Battle.net Name: Bulbasaaur
Battle.net Char Code: 615
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Aiur vs Korhal Ruling discussion

Post by Bulbasaaur » Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:09 am

how much does leperkon charge for a ddos
Locked