Season 9 Revision Overturned

Locked
User avatar
Blitz
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:34 pm
Battle.net Name: Blitzerg
Battle.net Char Code: 713
Battle.net Server: NA

Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by Blitz » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:44 am

Image
If a majority of the Owners and League Managers combined (more than 50% vote) disagree with a change made in emergency circumstances, the change will be revoked. Under this rule as can be seen, there is already a majority vote to overturn this management revision of the previous decision. Meepomart's vote is still unknown but I'll just assume it's a no.

Vote Tally:
Owners:
Watermelon-Yes
Stealth-No
Swift-Yes
Alerteyes-Yes
Perplex-Yes
Nova-No
Mets-Yes
Tenkz-Yes

Management:
Stealth-No
Swift-Yes
Meepomart-(No)
Sly-Yes

This vote count comes out to 8/12 combined owners / league managers are in favor of overturning this decision which is 67%. This is welllllll above the 50% threshold, so this revision of the previous decision will become void. This means that the original decision to replay the entire series from scratch will stand: http://www.zealothockey.net/forum/viewt ... =35&t=2395
Image

The only two links you ever need to click:
https://puu.sh/zFTwQ/57cfb6dd4f.png
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=2556
sidtkid
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:26 pm
Battle.net Name: SidtheKid
Battle.net Char Code: 601
Battle.net Server: NA
Location: Canada

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by sidtkid » Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:33 am

So if Mets gets ddos'd again, you replay the series again?

Seems fair enough to Aiur.
Yoda: HEAD OF STATS
Yoda: DOES 0 STATS
Yoda: SHAKE
Yoda: MY
Yoda: GOD
Yoda: DAMN
Yoda: HEAD
User avatar
Sir
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:37 pm
Battle.net Name: Sir
Battle.net Char Code: 1206
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by Sir » Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:07 am

Proper shitshow.

As a banjoer, it brings back fond memories.
User avatar
maha
Posts: 431
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:25 pm
Battle.net Name: maharishi
Battle.net Char Code: 576
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by maha » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:27 pm

why do mets and nova get a vote when they are directly invested in the outcome of the vote?

management is beyond hopeless at this point
"This is the most absurd piece of garbage that can't even be applied to the actual league. Great job embarrassing yourselves."
User avatar
Tenkz
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:27 pm
Battle.net Name: Tenkz
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by Tenkz » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:29 pm

Without Mets and Nova it comes out to 7/10 which is still above 50%.
User avatar
maha
Posts: 431
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:25 pm
Battle.net Name: maharishi
Battle.net Char Code: 576
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by maha » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:31 pm

Tenkz wrote:Without Mets and Nova it comes out to 7/10 which is still above 50%.
The point is you don't allow bias voters. It wouldn't have mattered here, but this is a rule for LMs so why shouldnt it be a rule for owners:
Make rulings based on his/her best interpretation of the rule book when needed and when he/she is not involved with the situation.
The rule is in place so that a LM won't cast a bias vote in favor of his/her team. The same should be for owners.
"This is the most absurd piece of garbage that can't even be applied to the actual league. Great job embarrassing yourselves."
User avatar
Marker
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:05 am
Battle.net Name: Marker
Battle.net Char Code: 164
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by Marker » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:51 pm

maha wrote:
Tenkz wrote:Without Mets and Nova it comes out to 7/10 which is still above 50%.
The point is you don't allow bias voters. It wouldn't have mattered here, but this is a rule for LMs so why shouldnt it be a rule for owners:
Make rulings based on his/her best interpretation of the rule book when needed and when he/she is not involved with the situation.
The rule is in place so that a LM won't cast a bias vote in favor of his/her team. The same should be for owners.
+1
Image

PGP KEY

Code: Select all

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0BO0QBS9-l_SW03alNQMnF6Z0U/view?usp=sharing
User avatar
maha
Posts: 431
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:25 pm
Battle.net Name: maharishi
Battle.net Char Code: 576
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by maha » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:53 pm

it's like you guys aren't even acknowledging the huge injustice being done toward nova's team. Nova and his team should not be punished for something they did not do, bottom line. Personally I've never quit a league, but I probably would protest this felon league if I were in the situation.
"This is the most absurd piece of garbage that can't even be applied to the actual league. Great job embarrassing yourselves."
User avatar
Tenkz
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:27 pm
Battle.net Name: Tenkz
Battle.net Char Code: 0
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by Tenkz » Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:13 pm

This doesn't at all punish Nova's team. They get to play from 0-0, despite being down 1-0 to full lineup Korhal. Additionally, they will likely be able to use Darkangel, who was missing for the series.

If they don't win, it just shows they shouldn't have won in the first place and got lucky that someone attacked Mets.
User avatar
maha
Posts: 431
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:25 pm
Battle.net Name: maharishi
Battle.net Char Code: 576
Battle.net Server: NA

Re: Season 9 Revision Overturned

Post by maha » Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:33 pm

Tenkz wrote:This doesn't at all punish Nova's team. They get to play from 0-0, despite being down 1-0 to full lineup Korhal. Additionally, they will likely be able to use Darkangel, who was missing for the series.

If they don't win, it just shows they shouldn't have won in the first place and got lucky that someone attacked Mets.
It's like you assume that if a team wins, that means they always had 100% chance to win from the start. Why even play then? How about we just decide who drafted the best team at the start, and champion them ZHL winner? The fact is, mets' team DID have a chance to win the original bo5 series. They didn't this time, but they played the series out regardless, giving them a CHANCE (nova's team was not 100% guaranteed to win). If mets' team had won, we wouldnt even be having this conversation. That itself is a huge advantage, and if we want to talk about precedence, the team who gets "attacked" is going to always have an inherent advantage IF AND ONLY IF the series is played to completion and THEN re-done.
"This is the most absurd piece of garbage that can't even be applied to the actual league. Great job embarrassing yourselves."
Locked