Page 2 of 5

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:31 pm
by ZachSmack
Blitz wrote:
Watermelon wrote: Season 4 Shakuras to Season 5:
Blitzerg: 2nd round -> 1st round
Oh really ? Where is my coaching, is it a in the future type deal where someday I will get this coaching ? PLS.
Blitzerg is self-taught I demand you take him off your list.

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:36 pm
by Bulbasaaur
lol

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:47 pm
by PeterDLai
Watermelon wrote: Season 4 Shakuras to Season 5:
Art: 4th round -> 2nd round
Swift: 7th round -> 3rd round
Seems kind of shady to include the players you picked in their respective rounds as owner of the Zerus Redlings...

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:49 pm
by forumusername
im all natural 0 waterfelon influence

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 12:52 am
by Cervalicious
lmao

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:16 am
by Watermelon
Blitz wrote: Oh really ? Where is my coaching, is it a in the future type deal where someday I will get this coaching ? PLS.
stay salty

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:37 am
by RusH
Image

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:39 am
by Marker
Watermelon wrote:
Marker wrote: All these reasons are subjective therefore no one should trust water.
How do you like nirvana fallacies now? huh.

PS: Sorry for double post.
All I see is a straw man. Go back to logic 101.
wrote: Person A: "We shouldn't let owners determine trade fairness because it's too subjective. Let's let the commish do it!"
Water: "But that's also subjective."
Marker: "Look mom! Water says subjective information can't be trusted!"
8-)
I'm glad you pointed out you were straw-manning me as you were about to do it.

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:42 am
by Cervalicious
RusH wrote:Image
Image

Re: Watermelon Coaching For Hire

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:43 am
by Watermelon
Marker wrote:
Watermelon wrote:
Marker wrote: All these reasons are subjective therefore no one should trust water.
How do you like nirvana fallacies now? huh.

PS: Sorry for double post.
All I see is a straw man. Go back to logic 101.
wrote: Person A: "We shouldn't let owners determine trade fairness because it's too subjective. Let's let the commish do it!"
Water: "But that's also subjective."
Marker: "Look mom! Water says subjective information can't be trusted!"
8-)
I'm glad you pointed out you were straw-manning me as you were about to do it.
you're welcome frnd